What Works in Synthetic Alignment: Evidence and Scorecard
The verdict is in. We deliver a scorecard on synthetic alignment, assessing which of RLHF's limitations have been solved and which remain, backed by six key empirical insights.
The verdict is in. We deliver a scorecard on synthetic alignment, assessing which of RLHF's limitations have been solved and which remain, backed by six key empirical insights.
Exploring five critical research frontiers: meta-alignment, post-deployment adaptation, breaking the iteration ceiling, judge bias auditing, and co-evolution dynamics.
A quantitative case study comparing the costs of human preference labeling (RLHF) versus synthetic preference generation (RLAIF), demonstrating how computational approaches …
Mapping the design space of synthetic alignment methods—two foundational paradigms and eight critical design factors that shape implementation choices and trade-offs.
This four-part research series examines why RLHF faces fundamental limitations and how synthetic alignment methods are reshaping the field, distilling insights from 20+ recent …